Silversky et al v. Ferriter et al

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 in full. Plaintiffs' Complaint 2 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; any appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 9/21/2011. Mailed to Silversky and Wilcock. (TAG, )

FI LEO

2011 BE? 21 PrJ

lj

23

"'CICY , v :\1\
rLEP';

T
, ! : ' ; :' " \ L ,"i J ' . J j
0"'

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA

GREAT FALLS DIVISION

JONATHAN SILVERSKY and
ERNEST WILCOCK,
No. CV 11-17-GF-SEH
Plaintiffs,
vs.

ORDER

MIKE FERRITER, et ai.,
Defendants.

On August 30, 2011, United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered
Findings and Recommendations! in this matter. Plaintiffs did not file objections.
No review is required of proposed findings and recommendations to which no
objection is made. Thomas y. Am, 474 U.S. 140, 149-152 (1986). However, this

1 Docket

No.9.

-1­

Court will review Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendations for clear error.
Upon review, I find no clear error in Judge Strong's Findings and
Recommendations and adopt them in full.
ORDERED:
1.

Plaintiffs' Complainf is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

2.

A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Any appeal would be taken

in bad faith due to the frivolous nature of the issues raised.
3

The Clerk of C~t is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

DATED this

.§.­

~ / day of September, 2011.

~~
United States District Judge

2

Docket No.2.
-2­