Redfern v. Montana Department of Corrections
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full. Defendants Janet Cox's and Sylvia Dubuisson's 9 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Summary judgment as to Defendant Denise McNeeley is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 5 is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 4/18/2012. (TAG, )
FI LE D
2012 APR 18 Pr'1 2 Y8
BY
DEPUTY CLEfl,K
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
GREAT FALLS DIVISION
MARTIN MORRIS REDFERN,
Plaintiff,
No. CV 11-49-GF-SEH
vs.
ORDER
JANET COX, DENISE McNEELEY,
SYLVIA DUBUISSON, and DOES 1
10,
Defendants.
On March 30, 2012, United States Magistrate Judge Keith Strong entered
Findings and Reconunendation l in this matter. Plaintiff did not file objections.
No review is required ofproposed findings and reconunendations to which no
I
Docket No. 20.
·1·
objection is made. Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140,149-152 (1986). However, this
Court will review Judge Strong's Findings and Recommendation for clear error.
Upon review, I find no clear error in Judge Strong's Findings and
Recommendation and adopt them in fulL
ORDERED:
1.
Defendants Janet Cox's and Sylvia Dubuisson's Motion for Summary
Judgmene is GRANTED.
2.
Summary judgment as to Defendant Denise McNeeley is GRANTED
as conceded by Plaintiff.3
2.
Plaintiffs Amended Complaint is DISMISSED.
3.
The Clerk of~rt is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
DATED this
11
day of April, 2012.
United States District Judge
2
Docket No.9.
3
Docket No. 17 at 1.
-2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?