Singleton v. Colvin

Filing 39

ORDER granting 38 Stipulated Motion for EAJA Fees. Defendant shall pay $11,500.00 in fees under the EAJA. Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees 37 is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 7/18/2016. (MMS, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION MARV ALEE J. SINGLETON, CV 13-03-GF-DLC Plaintiff, ORDER vs. CAROLYN W. COL VIN, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. The parties have stipulated that an award of $11,500.00 in attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (BAJA), 28 U.S.C. ยง 2414 et seq., is reasonable in this case. Because the parties have stipulated to this amount, Plaintiff's first motion for attorney fees in the amount of $16,107.58 will be denied as moot. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulated Motion for BAJA Fees (Doc. 38) is GRANTED. Defendant shall pay $11,500.00 in fees under the BAJA. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 3 7) is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if, after receiving the Court's BAJA fee order, the Commissioner (1) determines upon effectuation of the Court's BAJA fee -1- order that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, (2) agrees to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, and (3) is provided a valid assignment of fees executed by Plaintiff, the fees will be made payable to Plaintiffs attorney. However, ifthere is a debt owned under the Treasury Offset Program, the Commissioner cannot agree to waive the requirements of the Anti-Assignment Act, and the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check made out to Plaintiff, but delivered to Plaintiffs attorney. ~ Dated this _le_ day of July, 2016. Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge United States District Court -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?