Blackfeet Housing v. United States of America
Filing
55
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. in case 4:13-cv-00066-BMM-JTJ; ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. in case 4:13-cv-00079-BMM-JTJ; granting in part and denying in part (30) Motion for Summary Judgment; denying (34) Motion for P artial Summary Judgment in case 4:13-cv-00066-BMM-JTJ; granting in part and denying in part (29) Motion for Summary Judgment; denying (33) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in case 4:13-cv-00079-BMM-JTJ. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 12/14/2015. Associated Cases: 4:13-cv-00066-BMM-JTJ, 4:13-cv-00079-BMM-JTJ (SLL, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
GREAT FALLS DIVISION
CV 13-66-GF-BMM-JTJ
CV 13-79-GF-BMM-JTJ
BLACKFEET HOUSING,
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Acting by and through the Bureau of
Indian Affairs,
Defendants.
Plaintiff Blackfeet Housing is an entity owned by the Blackfeet Tribe.
Defendant United States of America, through the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA),
owns and maintains designated roads on the Blackfeet Indian Reservation.
Blackfeet Housing alleges in Civil Action 13-66-BMM-JTJ (the snow removal
case) that it cleared BIA-designated roads when BIA negligently failed to maintain
its roads. Blackfeet housing also alleges that BIA breached a fiduciary duty to
Blackfeet Housing. Blackfeet Housing alleges in Civil Action 13-79-GF-BMM-JTJ
(the storm drain case) that BIA failed to maintain the storm water collection and
conveyance system resulting in the flooding of Blackfeet Housing’s rental units.
1
The Court consolidated the cases. The United States of America filed a
motion for Summary Judgment (CV 13-66-GF-BMM-JTJ, Doc. 30; CV 13-79-GFBMM-JTJ, Doc. 29). Blackfeet Housing filed a motion for Partial Summary
Judgment (CV 13-66-GF-BMM-JTJ, Doc. 34; CV 13-79-GF-BMM-JTJ, Doc. 33.)
United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered Findings and
Recommendations in this matter on November 23, 2015. (Doc. 53.) Judge Johnston
recommended that the Court grant the United States’s Motion for Summary
Judgment as to the snow removal case. Judge Johnston also recommended that the
Court deny the United States’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to the storm
drains case. Judge Johnston further recommended that the Court deny Blackfeet
Housing’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.
When a party makes no objections, the Court need not review de novo the
proposed Findings and Recommendations. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52
(1986). Neither party objected to the Findings and Recommendations in this case.
This Court will review Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations,
however, for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach.,
Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).
The Court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that no
genuine issue of material fact exists and that the movant should be entitled to
judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). Counsel for the United States
2
conceded, during oral argument on November 17, 2015, that questions of fact
existed regarding the storm drain case. Likewise, Counsel for Blackfeet Housing
conceded that genuine issues of material fact existed relating to its Motion for
Summary Judgment. The Court finds no error in Judge Johnston’s
recommendations to deny those motions.
The United States, in the snow removal case, argues that sovereign
immunity divests the Court of jurisdiction. The United States asserts that BIA’s
actions fall within the discretionary function exception to the Federal Tort Claims
Act. Blackfeet Housing seeks recovery for costs incurred in labor, fuel, and repairs
to leased equipment. The FTCA limits the jurisdiction of the Court to claims of
“money damages” against the United States “for injury or loss of property. State of
Idaho ex rel. Trombley v. U.S. Dept. of Army, Corps of Engineers, 666 F.2d 444,
446 at (9th Cir. 1982). The FTCA does not permit a plaintiff to bring an action to
recover costs because “no injury or loss of property” exists, as required by the
FTCA. Blackfeet Housing alleges no injury to person or property. The Court finds
no error in Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations, and adopts them in
full.
Accordingly, IT IS SO ORDERED that:
3
1. The United States’s Motion for Summary Judgment (CV 13-66-GFBMM-JTJ, Doc. 30; CV 13-78-GF-BMM-JTJ, Doc. 29) is GRANTED
as to the snow removal case (CV 13-66-GF-BMM-JTJ).
2. The United States’s Motion for Summary Judgment (CV 13-66-GFBMM-JTJ, Doc. 30; CV 13-78-GF-BMM-JTJ, Doc. 29) is DENIED as
to the storm drain case (13-78-GF-BMM-JTJ).
3. Blackfeet Housing’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (CV 13-66GF-BMM-JTJ, Doc. 34; CV 13-78-GF-BMM-JTJ, Doc. 33) is DENIED.
DATED this 14th day of December, 2015,
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?