Kittson v. Dede et al

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 in full. The petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 3/7/2014. Mailed to Kittson. (TAG, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION ROBERT KITTSON, FILED MAR 0 7 20f~ ClerK, u.s. Distr", " District Of M( Missoufi CV 13-99-GF-DWM-RKS Petitioner, ORDER vs. RICK DEDE; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA, Respondents. Petitioner Robert Kittson is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. This matter comes before the Court on Kittson's writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Magistrate Judge Keith Strong recommends denying the petition. (Doc. 7.) Kittson is entitled to de novo review of the specified findings or recommendations to which he objects. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court reviews the Findings and Recommendations not specifically objected to for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 1 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000). Kittson did not file any objections and the Court finds no clear error in Judge Strong's analysis or conclusion. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendation (Doc. 7) are ADOPTED IN FULL. Kittson's petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to enter by separate document a judgment in favor of Respondents and against Petitioner. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. J- Dated this ~ day of March, 2014. Hoy, District Judge istrict Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?