Coates v. National Geographic
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 9 Findings and Recommendations. IT IS ORDERED:1.Plaintiffs Complaint (Doc. 2) is DISMISSED with prejudice.2.The filing of this action counts as one strike for failure to statea claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).3.Any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith asPlaintiffs claim is frivolous. 4.The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 4/7/2015. (SLL, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
GREAT FALLS DIVISION
RICCO COATES,
Plaintiff,
CV-14-70-GF-BMM
vs.
NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC,
ORDER
Defendant.
Plaintiff Ricco Coates (Coates) is a prisoner in the Montana State Prison in
Deer Lodge, Montana. Coates filed a Complaint pro se on September 18, 2014.
The Complaint alleges that Defendant National Geographic violated his Fourth
Amendment right to privacy in contravention of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by videotaping
his arrest in a public parking lot, and airing a recording of the arrest on a television
program about illegal drugs in Montana.
United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered Findings and
Recommendations in this matter on February 5, 2015. (Doc. 9). Judge Johnston
recommended that the Complaint be dismissed because it failed to state a claim
under § 1983. (Doc. 9 at 2-3). Coates did not file objections to Judge Johnston’s
Findings and Recommendations.
The Court has reviewed Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations
for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656
F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). The Court finds no error in Judge Johnston’s
Findings and Recommendations, and adopts them in full. To state a claim under 42
U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege: 1) that a right secured by the Constitution or
laws of the United States was violated, and 2) that the violation was committed by a
person or entity acting under color of state law. See West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48
(1988). Coates has failed to allege a Fourth Amendment violation based upon an
invasion of privacy. The events recorded by National Geographic occurred in the
open, in a public parking lot. The United States Supreme Court has stated that
“[w]hat a person knowingly exposes to the public . . . is not a subject of Fourth
Amendment protection.” Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 351 (1967); see also,
State v. Ditton, 144 P.3d 783, 791 (Mont. 2006).
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:
1.
Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 2) is DISMISSED with prejudice.
2.
The filing of this action counts as one strike for failure to state
a claim. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3.
Any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith as
Plaintiff’s claim is frivolous.
-2-
4.
The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
DATED this 7th day of April, 2015.
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?