Mitrano v. United States of America et al

Filing 28

CLERK'S JUDGMENT 1. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) is GRANTED. 2. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Copy mailed to Plt. Mitrano) (ACC)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MONTANA
GREAT FALLS DIVISION

Case No. CV-16-13-GF-BMM

PETER P. MITRANO,

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Plaintiff,
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
and KERI A. ADORISIO,
Defendant.

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The
issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.
X
Decision by Court. This action came before the Court for bench trial,
hearing, or determination on the record. A decision has been rendered.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED
1.

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) is GRANTED.

2.

Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction.

Dated this 7th day of February, 2017.
TYLER P. GILMAN, CLERK
By: /s/ Athena Cobb
Athena Cobb, Deputy Clerk