Upper Missouri Waterkeeper v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al

Filing 260

AMENDED CLERK'S JUDGMENT. This matter comes before the Court on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Case No. 4:16-cv-00052- BMM and the United States Environmental Protection Agencys Motion for Entry of Order and Amended Final Judgment. IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. In accordance with the instructions of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on remand to this Court, Upper Missouri Waterkeepers motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 148) is denied and EPAs and intervenor-defendants motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 151, 155, 159, 161, 165) are granted in full. (SLR)

Case 4:16-cv-00052-BMM Document 260 Filed 06/29/22 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MONTANA
GREAT FALLS DIVISION

UPPER MISSOURI
WATERKEEPER,

Case No. CV-16-52 -GF-BMM

Plaintiff,
vs.
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY AND ANDREW
WHEELER, ADMINISTRATOR,
UNITED STATES
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY,
Defendants,
and
STATE OF MONTANA
DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY,
TREASURE STATE RESOURCE
ASSOCIATION OF MONTANA,
MONTANA LEAGUE OF CITIES
AND TOWNS, and NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION OF CLEAN WATER
AGENCIES,
Intervenor-Defendants.

AMENDED JUDGMENT IN A
CIVIL CASE

Case 4:16-cv-00052-BMM Document 260 Filed 06/29/22 Page 2 of 2

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The
issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.
X
Decision by Court. This action came before the Court for bench trial,
hearing, or determination on the record. A decision has been rendered.
IT IS ORDERED:
This matter comes before the Court on remand from the United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Case No. 4:16-cv-00052-BMM and the
United States Environmental Protection Agency’s Motion for Entry of Order
and Amended Final Judgment. IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. In
accordance with the instructions of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
on remand to this Court, Upper Missouri Waterkeeper’s motion for summary
judgment (Doc. No. 148) is denied and EPA’s and intervenor-defendants’
motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 151, 155, 159, 161, 165) are
granted in full.
Dated this 29th day of June, 2022.
TYLER P. GILMAN, CLERK
By: /s/ S. Redding
S. Redding, Deputy Clerk