Cleary v. Retirement Plan for Employees of Northern Montana Hospital et al

Filing 34

ORDER: Based upon the 33 unopposed motion of Defendants, and for good cause appearing therefore; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's time within which to file papers in opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 30 ) i s extended to two (2) weeks after Defendants have served their response and produced documents in response to Plaintiff's First Request for Production of Documents, which are due to be served no later than October 17, 2016 Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 9/19/2016. (SLR, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION JOEL CLEARY, M.D., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. CV-16-61-GF-BMM ORDER RETIREMENT PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF NORTHERN MONTANA HOSPITAL, ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE RETIREMENT PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF NORTHERN MONTANA HOSPITAL, DAVID HENRY, KIM LUCKE, BONNIE O’NEILL, and NORTHERN MONTANA HOSPITAL, Defendants. Based on the unopposed motion of Defendants, and for good cause appearing, therefore; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s time within which to file papers in opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 30) is extended to two (2) weeks after Defendants have served their response and produced documents in response to Plaintiff’s First Request for Production of Documents, which are due to be served no later than October 17, 2016. Dated this 19th day of September, 2016. ORDER- Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?