Indigenous Environmental Network et al v. United States Department of State et al
Filing
82
ORDER: Northern Plains Resource Council et al v. Shannon et al, No. CV-17-31-GF-BMM is hereby consolidate with this action, CV-17-29-GF-BMM, for the limited purposes of briefing and scheduling, with this action designated as the lead case. SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 10/4/2017. Associated Cases: 4:17-cv-00029-BMM, 4:17-cv-00031-BMM (MMS)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
GREAT FALLS DIVISION
INDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL
NETWORK and NORTH COAST
RIVER ALLIANCE,
CV-17-29-GF-BMM
CV-17-31-GF-BMM
and
NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE
COUNCIL, et al.,
ORDER
Plaintiffs,
vs.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF STATE, et al.,
Defendants
and
TRANSCANADA KEYSTONE
PIPELINE and TRANSCANADA
CORPORATION,
Defendant-Intervenors.
The Court ordered that each party file a statement of position for the Court’s
review regarding the consolidation of Indigenous Environmental Network, et al v.
United States Department of State, et al (4:17-cv-00029-BMM) and Northern
Plains Resource Council, et al v. Shannon, et al (4:17-cv-00031-BMM) on August
1
29, 2017. The Court has reviewed the parties’ statements of position and hereby
enters the following order:
1. Northern Plains Resource Council et al v. Shannon et al, No. CV 17-31 (D.
Mont., filed March 30, 2017) is hereby consolidated with this action, No.
CV 17-29-BMM (D. Mont., filed March 27, 2017), for the limited purposes
of briefing and scheduling, with this action designated as the lead case.
2. Plaintiffs in CV 17-29-BMM and Plaintiffs in CV 17-31-BMM will each
retain the right to file separate briefs and will be permitted separate time for
argument at any hearings. Likewise, Federal Defendants and DefendantIntervenors will each be permitted to file separate briefs and will be
permitted separate time for arguments.
3. A separate judgment will be entered in each suit.
DATED this 4th day of October, 2017.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?