State of New Mexico et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al

Filing 18

ORDER: Plaintiffs have moved for admission of Elizabeth Rumsey to appear pro hac vice in this case with Roger M. Sullivan, of McGarvey, Heberling, Sullivan & Lacey, P.C. to act as local counsel. Ms. Rumseys application appears to be in compliance wit h L.R. 83.1(d). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Plaintiff's 14 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED, subject to the following conditions: SEE ORDER FOR FULL DETAILS. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 6/19/2017. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 6/2/2017. (ACC)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., CV-17-42-GF-BMM Plaintiff, ORDER v. RYAN ZINKE, et al., Defendants. Plaintiffs have moved for admission of Elizabeth Rumsey (Ms. Rumsey) (Doc. 14) to practice before this Court in this case with Roger Sullivan of McGarvey, Heberling, Sullivan & Lacey, P.C. to act as local counsel. Ms. Rumsey’s application appears to be in compliance with L.R. 83.1(d). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Plaintiffs’ motion to allow Ms. Rumsey to appear on their behalf (Doc. 14) is GRANTED on the following conditions: -1- 1. Local counsel, Mr. Sullivan will be designated as lead counsel or as colead counsel with Ms. Rumsey. Ms. Rumsey must do her own work. She must do her own writing, sign her own pleadings, motions, briefs and other documents served or filed by her, and, if designated co-lead counsel, must appear and participate personally in all proceedings before the Court. Local counsel, Mr. Sullivan shall also shall also sign such pleadings, motions and briefs and other documents served or filed. 2. Admission is not granted until Ms. Rumsey, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order has filed an acknowledgment and acceptance of her admission under the terms set forth above. 3. Admission is personal to Ms. Rumsey. DATED this 2nd day of June, 2017. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?