Darvis et al v. Them et al

Filing 19

ORDER granting 18 Defendants' Motion for attorney Randall A. Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 9/5/2017. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 8/21/2017. (TLO) Modified on 8/21/2017 to reflect order mailed to PHV cnsl Randall A. Miller (TLO).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION RICK G. DARVIS, individual, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CERTIFIED COLLEGE PLANNERS, LLC, a Montana limited liability company, COLLEGE FUNDING, INC., a Montana company, CV-17-53-GF-BMM ORDER Plaintiffs, vs. RONALD W. THEM, individual, MY CASH FLOW COACH LLC, a limited liability company, JOSHUA A. MINER, individual, SPIKE SALES LLC, a limited liability company, Defendants. Defendants have moved for admission of Randall A. Miller (Mr. Miller) (Doc. 18) to practice before this Court in this case with Brian L. Taylor of Hall & Evans LLC to act as local counsel. Mr. Miller’s application appears to be in compliance with L.R. 83.1(d). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendants’ motion to allow Mr. Miller to appear on their behalf (Doc. 18) -1- is GRANTED on the following conditions: 1. Local counsel, Mr. Taylor will be designated as lead counsel or as colead counsel with Mr. Miller. Mr. Miller must do is own work. He must do his own writing, sign his own pleadings, motions, briefs and other documents served or filed by him, and, if designated co-lead counsel, must appear and participate personally in all proceedings before the Court. Local counsel, Mr. Taylor shall also shall also sign such pleadings, motions and briefs and other documents served or filed. 2. Admission is not granted until Mr. Miller, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order has filed an acknowledgment and acceptance of his admission under the terms set forth above. 3. Admission is personal to Mr. Miller. DATED this 21st day of August, 2017. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?