Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Think Finance

Filing 84

ORDER granting 82 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Steven Ellis ; granting 83 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Jeremy Lateiner. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 9/27/2018. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 9/12/2018. (Copy of order mailed to PHV counsel) (MMS)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, CV-17-127-GF-BMM Plaintiff, ORDER v. THINK FINANCE, LLC, f/k/a THINK FINANCE, INC. Defendants. Defendants have moved for an order allowing Steven Ellis, Esq. and Jeremy Lateiner, Esq. to appear pro hac vice in this case with Leo S. Ward, Esq., designated as local counsel. The applications of Mr. Ellis and Mr. Lateiner appear to be in compliance with L.R. 83.1(d). IT IS ORDERED: Defendants’s motions to allow Mr. Ellis and Mr. Lateiner to appear on their behalf (Docs. 82 and 83) are GRANTED, subject to the following conditions: 1. Local counsel shall exercise the responsibilities required by L.R. 83.1(d)(5) and must be designated as lead counsel or as co-lead counsel; 2. Only one attorney appearing pro hac vice may act as co-lead counsel; 3. Mr. Ellis and Mr. Lateiner must each do their own work. Each must do their own writing, sign their own pleadings, motions, briefs, and, if designated colead counsel, must appear and participate personally in all proceedings before the Court; 4. Local counsel shall also sign all such pleadings, motions and briefs and other documents served or filed; and 5. Admission is personal to Mr. Ellis and Mr. Lateiner. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: Each applicant shall file, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order, an acknowledgment and acceptance of their admission under the terms set forth above. DATED this 12th day of September, 2018. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?