Bennett v. Cascade County et al
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 23 in full. Claims against Joshua Racki as raised in first Motion to Amend 14 DISMISSED; claims against Planned Parenthood of Great Falls, Officer Kneifer, Medical Staff on duty January 24, 2018, and Officer Gremenwald and all claims raised in Motionto Amend 15 DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 6/18/2018. Mailed to Bennett (TAG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
GREAT FALLS DIVISION
BRANDON CORDELL BENNETT,
CV-18-00006-GF-BMM-JTJ
Plaintiff,
vs.
ORDER
CASCADE COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.
Plaintiff Brandon Bennett filed what has been construed as two motions to
amend his Complaint (Docs. 14, 15) and a motion to reconsider appointment of
counsel (Doc. 19). United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered Findings
and Recommendations in this matter on May 30, 2018. (Doc. 23.) Neither party
filed objections.
When a party makes no objections, the Court need not review de novo the
proposed Findings and Recommendations. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52
(1986). This Court will review Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations,
however, for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach.,
Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981).
1
A. Joshua Racki
Bennett seeks to amend his Complaint to add Joshua A. Racki, the Cascade
County Attorney, as a defendant. Bennett alleges that Racki remains responsible
for the custody of federal inmates in the Cascade County Detention Facility and the
conditions therein. Supervising officers cannot be held liable under a respondeat
superior theory under §1983. Monell v. Dep’t of Social Serv. of City of New York,
436 U.S. 658, 691-94 (1978). Supervising officers can be held under § 1983 “only
if they play an affirmative part in the alleged deprivation of constitutional rights.”
King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 568 (9th Cir. 1987).
Judge Johnston correctly determined that Bennett alleges only that Racki as
the chief law enforcement official for Cascade County remains responsible for the
custody of federal inmates at the Cascade County Detention Center. (Doc. 23 at 5.)
This allegation proves insufficient to state a claim for supervisory liability against
Racki. This claim will be dismissed.
B. Medical Care
Bennett alleges that on January 24, 2018, he was denied medical treatment.
Bennett alleges that Officer Kneifer called over the pod intercom for the inmates to
lock down for medication pass. Bennett waited in his cell, but it never happened.
Officer Kneifer explained to Bennett that he needed to line up when she called over
the intercom to lock down for medication pass.
2
To plead a cognizable claim for denial of medical treatment, a plaintiff must
prove the following: (i) the defendant made an intentional decision with respect to
the conditions under which the plaintiff was confined; (ii) those conditions put the
plaintiff at substantial risk of suffering serious harm; (iii) the defendant did not
take reasonable available measures to abate that risk . . . making the consequences
of the defendant’s conduct obvious; and (iv) by not taking such measures, the
defendant caused the plaintiff’s injuries. Gordon v. Cnty. of Orange, 888 F.3d 1118
(9th Cir. 2018).
Judge Johnston correctly determined that Bennett’s allegation does not
establish an intentional decision to deny Bennett medical care or that the single
missed dose of medication put Bennett at a substantial risk of suffering serious
harm. (Doc. 23 at 7.) This claim will be dismissed.
C. Motion to Reconsider Appointment of Counsel
The Court will liberally construe Bennett’s filing as a motion for leave to file
a motion for reconsideration out of an abundance of caution. A judge may only
request counsel for an indigent plaintiff under “exceptional circumstances.” 28
U.S.C. 1915(e)(1). Judge Johnston correctly determined that Bennett has not made
a showing of exceptional circumstances. (Doc. 23 at 10.)
3
The Court has reviewed Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations
for clear error. The Court finds no error in Judge Johnston’s Findings and
Recommendations, and adopts them in full.
IT IS ORDERED that Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc.
23), are ADOPTED IN FULL.
IT IS ORDERED that Bennett’s claims against Joshua Racki as raised in his
first Motion to Amend (Doc. 14) are DISMISSED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Bennett’s claims against Planned
Parenthood of Great Falls, Officer Kneifer, Medical Staff on duty January 24,
2018, and Officer Gremenwald and all claims raised in the April 24, 2018, Motion
to Amend (Doc. 15) are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim.
DATED this 18th day of June, 2018.
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?