United States v. ASARCO, Inc.
CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of United States against ASARCO for the purposes of the East Helena CAMU Trust have not been fulfilled and the CAMU Trust has notbeen properly terminated and continues in effect. ASARCOs Motion to terminate the East Helena CAMU Trust (Doc. 9) is DENIED. (HEG, )
AO 450 (Rev. 01/09) Judgment in a Civil Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the HELENA DIVISION DISTRICT OF MONTANA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v. MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST GROUP, LLC,
) ) ) ) )
Civil Action No.
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION The court has ordered that (check one): the plaintiff (name) defendant (name) interest at the rate of dollars ($ %, plus postjudgment interest at the rate of recover from the the amount of ), which includes prejudgment %, along with costs.
the plaintiff recover nothing, the action be dismissed on the merits, and the defendant (name) recover costs from the plaintiff (name) . other: This action was (check one): tried by a jury with Judge rendered a verdict. tried by Judge was reached. presiding, and the jury has without a jury and the above decision
T decided by Judge Charles C. Lovell on a motion for Summary Judgment by the United States (Doc. 20) is partially GRANTED to the extent that this Court hereby adjudicated that the purposes of the East Helena CAMU Trust have not been fulfilled and the CAMU Trust has not been properly terminated and continues in effect. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that ASARCO's Motion to terminate the East Helena CAMU Trust (Doc. 9) is DENIED. .
August 10, 2010
CLERK OF COURT /s/ Heidi Gauthier
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?