ASARCO v. British Petroleum et al

Filing 214

ORDER granting 212 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice ; granting 213 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 1/31/2018. Copy of Order mailed to PHV counsel. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 1/16/2018. (HEG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION ASARCO LLC, a Delaware Corporation, CV 12-53-H-DLC Plaintiff, ORDER vs. ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion for Pro Hae Vice Admission of Alicia C. O'Brien (Doc. 212) and Motion for Pro Hae Vice Admission ofKeola Robert Whittaker (Doc. 213 ). Plaintiff states that Kris A. McLean will act as local counsel for both Alicia C. O'Brien ("O'Brien") and Keola Robert Whittaker ("Whittaker"). order. Both O'Brien's and Whittaker's applications appear to be in Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Pro Hae Vice Admission of Alicia C. O'Brien (Doc. 212) and Motion for Pro Hae Vice Admission ofKeola Robert Whittaker (Doc. 213) are GRANTED on the condition that'. O'Brien and Whittaker shall do their own work. This means that both must: ( 1) do their own -1- writing; (2) sign their own pleadings, motions, and briefs; and (3) appear and participate personally in all hearings and other proceedings scheduled by the Court. Counsel shall take steps to register in the Court's electronic filing system ("CMECF"). Further information on CM-ECF is available on the Court's website, www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from the Clerk's Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that O'Brien and Whittaker shall file separate pleadings acknowledging their admission under the terms set forth above within fifteen days of this Order. Should either fail to do so, this Order is subject to withdrawal as it relates to non-compliant counsel. DATED this ' ' ~ay of January, 2018. Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge United States District Court -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?