Golie v. Kirkegard et al

Filing 32

ORDER ADOPTING 27 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; denying 25 Motion for temporary injunction and motion to add claims. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 12/17/2015. Mailed to Golie. (TAG, )

Download PDF
FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION DEC 17 2015 C~.S District Court ct.Of Montana Missoula CV 14-10-H-DLC-JTJ ANDREW DAVID GOLIE, Plaintiff, ORDER vs. THOMAS MALCOMB, PAUL LUCIER, DENISE DEYOTTE, and DR. EDWARDS, Defendants. United States Magistrate Judge John T. Johnston entered an order, findings, and recommendations in this case on October 5, 2015, denying Plaintiff Andrew David Golie' s ("Golie") motions for appointment of counsel and extension of the discovery deadline, and recommending denial of his motion for temporary injunction and motion to add claims. Golie did not object to the order or to the findings and recommendations, and so waived the right to de nova review of the latter. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(l)(C). This Court reviews for clear error those findings and recommendations to which no party objects. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Clear error exists ifthe Court is left with a -1- "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). Having reviewed the findings and recommendations, the Court finds no clear error in Judge Johnston's conclusions that Golie's motion for injunction relates to issues beyond this matter, and that Golie's motion to amend is both untimely and noncompliant with local and federal rules. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Judge Johnston's findings and recommendations (Doc. 27) are ADOPTED IN FULL. Golie's motion for temporary injunction and motion to add claims (Doc. 25) are DENIED. DATED this r=t ~ of December, day Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge United States District Court -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?