Martindale v. Montana D.O.C. et al

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 22 in full; denying 15 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 8/15/2016. Mailed to Martindale. (TAG, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION CV 15-111-H-DLC-JTJ MICHAEL MARTINDALE, Plaintiff, ORDER vs. LEROY KIRKEGARD and MIKE BATISTA, Defendants. United States Magistrate Judge John Johnston entered his Order, Findings and Recommendations in this matter on July 15, 2016, recommending denial of Defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Defendants failed to timely object to the Findings and Recommendations, and so waived their right to de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(l)(C). This Court reviews for clear error those findings and recommendations to which no party objects. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Clear error exists ifthe Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). -1- SCANNED Having reviewed the Findings and Recommendations, the Court finds no clear error in Judge Johnston's conclusion that Defendants' motion should be denied. Plaintiff Michael Martindale has stated a plausible claim of supervisory liability against Defendants; (2) his claims for both monetary and injunctive relief survived the prescreening process; and (3) his claims for injunctive relief are not moot, to the extent that he is still subject to the Department of Corrections policies in terms of medical care. There being no clear error in Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Judge Johnston's Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 22) are ADOPTED IN FULL. (2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. 15) is DENIED. ~ Dated this __l_2_ day of August, 2016. C~t~n~ DanaL. United States District Court -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?