National Association for Gun Rights v. Motl et al
Filing
30
ORDER granting 26 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Affidavit to S.N. for entering attorney information. Copy of order mailed to PHV counsel. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 3/10/2017. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 2/23/2017. (HEG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
HELENA DIVISION
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR
GUN RIGHTS, INC.,
(Consolidated with
CV 16-33-H-DLC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER
vs.
JONATHAN MOTL, in his official
capacity as the Commissioner of
Political Practices for the State of
Montana; TIMOTHY C. FOX, in his
official capacity as Attorney General
for the State of Montana; LEO
GALLAGHER, in his official capacity
as County Attorney for the County of
Lewis & Clark,
Defendants.
Plaintiff National Association for Gun Rights, Inc. moves for the admission
of David A. Warrington to practice before this Court in this case with Matthew G.
Monforton to act as local counsel. The application appears to be in order.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to admit David A.
Warrington pro hac vice (Doc. 26) is GRANTED on the condition that Mr.
Warrington shall do his own work. This means that he must: ( 1) do his own
writing; (2) sign his own pleadings, motions, and briefs; and (3) appear and
-1-
participate personally. Counsel shall take steps to register in the Court's electronic
filing system (CM-ECF). Further information is available on the Court's website,
www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from the Clerk's Office.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless
Mr. Warrington within fifteen (15) days of this Order, file a separate pleading
acknowledging his admission under the terms set forth above.
DATED this
2.3YLday of February, 2017.
Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge
United States District Court
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?