National Association for Gun Rights v. Motl et al

Filing 30

ORDER granting 26 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Affidavit to S.N. for entering attorney information. Copy of order mailed to PHV counsel. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 3/10/2017. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 2/23/2017. (HEG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS, INC., (Consolidated with CV 16-33-H-DLC) Plaintiff, ORDER vs. JONATHAN MOTL, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of Political Practices for the State of Montana; TIMOTHY C. FOX, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Montana; LEO GALLAGHER, in his official capacity as County Attorney for the County of Lewis & Clark, Defendants. Plaintiff National Association for Gun Rights, Inc. moves for the admission of David A. Warrington to practice before this Court in this case with Matthew G. Monforton to act as local counsel. The application appears to be in order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to admit David A. Warrington pro hac vice (Doc. 26) is GRANTED on the condition that Mr. Warrington shall do his own work. This means that he must: ( 1) do his own writing; (2) sign his own pleadings, motions, and briefs; and (3) appear and -1- participate personally. Counsel shall take steps to register in the Court's electronic filing system (CM-ECF). Further information is available on the Court's website,, or from the Clerk's Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless Mr. Warrington within fifteen (15) days of this Order, file a separate pleading acknowledging his admission under the terms set forth above. DATED this 2.3YLday of February, 2017. Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge United States District Court -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?