National Association for Gun Rights v. Motl et al
Filing
53
ORDER The Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's request to withdraw their pending fee motions re 52 . Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 1/19/2018. (HEG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
HELENA DIVISION
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR
GUN RIGHTS, INC.,
CV 16-23-H-DLC-JTJ
(Consolidated with
CV 16-33-H-DLC-JTJ)
Plaintiff,
ORDER
vs.
JEFF MANGAN, in his official
capacity as the Commissioner of
Political Practices for the State of
Montana; TIMOTHY C. FOX, in his
official capacity as Attorney General
for the State of Montana; LEO
GALLAGHER, in his official capacity
as County Attorney for the County of
Lewis & Clark,
Defendants.
Pending before this Court is a motion by Plaintiff National Association For
Gun Rights, Inc. (NAGR) for an award of attorney's fees and expenses as well as a
similar motion by Plaintiff J.C. Kantorowicz in Kantorowicz v. Motl, No. CV 1633-H-DLC-JTJ, Doc. 28 (D. Mont. Jan. 16, 2018), a case that the Court has
consolidated with this matter.
NAGR, Mr. Kantorowicz, and Defendants Jeff
Mangan and Timothy Fox have agreed that Defendants shall make a lump sum
payment of $18,900 to NAGR and Mr. Kantorowicz, which shall constitute
-1-
payment in full for all fees and costs incurred by NAGR in litigating its First and
Third Causes of Action in this matter as well as all fees and costs incurred by Mr.
Kantorowicz in litigating Kantorowicz v. Motl.
This payment shall not preclude
NAGR from seeking additional costs and fees in the event it prevails in its appeal
from the Court's dismissal ofNAGR's Second Cause of Action.
In light of this agreement, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs' request to
withdraw their pending fee motions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
+ii
DATED this Jj_ day of January, 2018.
Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge
United States District Court
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?