United States of America v. Nistler et al

Filing 8

ORDER granting 6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice subject to following conditions. Copy of Order mailed to PHV Counsel. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 7/25/2018. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 7/10/2018. (HEG)

Download PDF
FILED JUL 10 2018 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Clerk, U.S. District Court District Of Montana Helena FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, CV 16-94-H-SEH vs. ORDER GABRIEL NISTLER, SOMMER NISTLER, ROSS W. ROYLANCE, PATRICIA ROYLANCE, ROYLANCE & NISTLER PROPERTIES, LLC, WERNERNESTLER PROPERTIES, LLC DEREK BROWN, AND DEREK BROWN CONSULTING, INC., ,. Defendants. On July 9, 2018, Defendants moved for admission of Richard Martin Hunt, Esq., ("Hunt") of Hunt Huey PLLC, Dallas, Texas, to practice before this Court in this case with Brian K. Gallik, Esq., of Gallik, Bremer & Molloy, P.C., Bozeman, -1- Montana, to act as local counsel. 1 Hunt's application appears to be in compliance with L.R. 83.l(d). ORDERED: Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Admission of Richard Hunt Pro Hae Vice 2 is GRANTED subject to the following conditions: I. Local counsel must serve as lead counsel or as co-lead counsel; 2. Hunt must do his own work. He must do his own writing, sign his own pleadings, motions, briefs and other documents served or filed by him, and, if designated co-lead counsel, must appear and participate personally in all proceedings before the Court. 3. Local counsel shall also sign all such pleadings, motions and briefs and other documents served or filed. Admission is personal to Hunt; it is not an admission of Hunt Huey PLLC law firm. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: This Order will be withdrawn unless Hunt, within fifteen (15) days from the 'Doc. 6. 2 Doc. 6. -2- date of this Order, files an acknowledgment and acceptance of his admission under the terms set forth above. DATED this /O~ay of July, 2018. ,L111H11r1rn) ~.HADDON United States District Judge -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?