United States of America v. Nistler et al
Filing
8
ORDER granting 6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice subject to following conditions. Copy of Order mailed to PHV Counsel. Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 7/25/2018. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 7/10/2018. (HEG)
FILED
JUL 10 2018
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Clerk, U.S. District Court
District Of Montana
Helena
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
HELENA DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
CV 16-94-H-SEH
vs.
ORDER
GABRIEL NISTLER, SOMMER
NISTLER, ROSS W. ROYLANCE,
PATRICIA ROYLANCE,
ROYLANCE & NISTLER
PROPERTIES, LLC, WERNERNESTLER PROPERTIES, LLC
DEREK BROWN, AND DEREK
BROWN CONSULTING, INC.,
,.
Defendants.
On July 9, 2018, Defendants moved for admission of Richard Martin Hunt,
Esq., ("Hunt") of Hunt Huey PLLC, Dallas, Texas, to practice before this Court in
this case with Brian K. Gallik, Esq., of Gallik, Bremer & Molloy, P.C., Bozeman,
-1-
Montana, to act as local counsel. 1 Hunt's application appears to be in compliance
with L.R. 83.l(d).
ORDERED:
Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Admission of Richard Hunt Pro Hae
Vice 2 is GRANTED subject to the following conditions:
I.
Local counsel must serve as lead counsel or as co-lead counsel;
2.
Hunt must do his own work. He must do his own writing, sign his
own pleadings, motions, briefs and other documents served or filed by him, and, if
designated co-lead counsel, must appear and participate personally in all
proceedings before the Court.
3.
Local counsel shall also sign all such pleadings, motions and briefs
and other documents served or filed.
Admission is personal to Hunt; it is not an admission of Hunt Huey PLLC
law firm.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:
This Order will be withdrawn unless Hunt, within fifteen (15) days from the
'Doc. 6.
2
Doc. 6.
-2-
date of this Order, files an acknowledgment and acceptance of his admission under
the terms set forth above.
DATED this
/O~ay of July, 2018.
,L111H11r1rn)
~.HADDON
United States District Judge
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?