Schmitt v. WIPFLI et al
ORDERED: Count V of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. All remaining counts contained in Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint remain in effect. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 9/5/2017. (HEG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
SEP Ll 5 2017
Clerk, U.S Oistrict Court
District Of Montana
JOSEPH LAMPORT, JR., individually
and on behalf of Rob's Easy Auto Buy
Here/Pay Here, LLC; KATHERINE
LAMPORT, individually and on
behalf of Rob's Easy Auto Buy
Here/Pay Here, LLC; GALUSHA
HIGGINS & GALUSHA, P.C.; and
BRADLEY COOK, CPA, individually
and on behalf of GALUSHA,
HIGGINS & GALUSHA, P.C.,
On August 15, 201 7, Plaintiff April Schmitt requested an Order dismissing
Count V of her Second Amended Complaint 1 against Defendant Galusha, Higgins
& Galusha, P.C. ("GHG"), which alleged that GHG violated the Fair Debt
Doc. No. 27.
Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. 1692, et. seq. 2 As of the filing of the Plaintiffs
motion, Defendants Joseph and Katherine Lamport had not responded and the
Court issued an order directing compliance with L.R. 7.1 (c)( 1). 3 On August 16,
2017, Defendants Joseph Lamport and Katherine Lamport responded stating they
do not oppose Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Count V against Defendant Galusha,
Higgins & Galusha, P.C. 4 Additionally, Plaintiff April Schmitt provided a
statement of compliance on August 29, 2017. 5
Count V of Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint is dismissed with
All remaining counts contained in Plaintiffs Second Amended
Complaint remain in effect.
day of September, 2017.
United States District Judge
Doc. No. 54
Doc. No. 58.
Doc. No. 57.
Doc. No. 59.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?