Schmitt v. WIPFLI et al

Filing 62

ORDERED: Count V of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. All remaining counts contained in Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint remain in effect. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 9/5/2017. (HEG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION FILED SEP Ll 5 2017 Clerk, U.S Oistrict Court District Of Montana Helena APRIL SCHMITT, Plaintiff, No. CV-16-106-H-SEH vs. ORDER JOSEPH LAMPORT, JR., individually and on behalf of Rob's Easy Auto Buy Here/Pay Here, LLC; KATHERINE LAMPORT, individually and on behalf of Rob's Easy Auto Buy Here/Pay Here, LLC; GALUSHA HIGGINS & GALUSHA, P.C.; and BRADLEY COOK, CPA, individually and on behalf of GALUSHA, HIGGINS & GALUSHA, P.C., Defendants. On August 15, 201 7, Plaintiff April Schmitt requested an Order dismissing Count V of her Second Amended Complaint 1 against Defendant Galusha, Higgins & Galusha, P.C. ("GHG"), which alleged that GHG violated the Fair Debt 1 Doc. No. 27. Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. 1692, et. seq. 2 As of the filing of the Plaintiffs motion, Defendants Joseph and Katherine Lamport had not responded and the Court issued an order directing compliance with L.R. 7.1 (c)( 1). 3 On August 16, 2017, Defendants Joseph Lamport and Katherine Lamport responded stating they do not oppose Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss Count V against Defendant Galusha, Higgins & Galusha, P.C. 4 Additionally, Plaintiff April Schmitt provided a statement of compliance on August 29, 2017. 5 ORDERED: 1. Count V of Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. 2. All remaining counts contained in Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint remain in effect. DATED this S day of September, 2017. ~~~ United States District Judge 2 Doc. No. 54 3 Doc. No. 58. 4 Doc. No. 57. 5 Doc. No. 59. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?