Rickett v. Kirkegard et al

Filing 26

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 25 in full. Any appeal of this decision is not to be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 12/17/2018. Mailed to Rickett (TAG) . Modified on 12/17/2018 to attach correct document; NEF regenerated (TAG).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION CHARLES DUSTIN RICKETT, CV-17-02-H-BMM-JTJ Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LEROY KIRKGARD, DARCY HUNT, MIKE BATISTA, BEN BOULEY, and KRISTY COBBAN, Defendants. United States Magistrate Judge Johnston entered Findings and Recommendations on November 27, 2018. (Doc. 25). The Court issued an Order requiring Mr. Rickett to show cause as to why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Doc. 24). Judge Johnston determined Mr. Rickett failed to respond and show cause. (Doc. 25). No party filed objections to Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations. The Court has reviewed the Findings and Recommendation for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). The Court finds no error in Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations and adopts them in full. 1 ORDER Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 25) are ADOPTED IN FULL. IT IS ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this matter, enter judgement pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and terminate all pending motions. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to have the docket reflect that the Court certifies pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3)(A) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure that any appeal of this decision is not to be taken in good faith. DATED this 17th day of December, 2018. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?