Victory Processing et al v. Fox

Filing 49

ORDERED: Plaintiffs' "Unopposed Motion To Transfer Consideration of Attorneys Fees on Appeal to District Court" (Doc. 47) is GRANTED, despite Plaintiffs' failure to submit a proposed order, as required by L.R. 7. l(c)(3). Counsel are reminded that both local counsel and pro hac vice counsel are expected to follow the local rules of this Court. Signed by Judge Charles C. Lovell on 10/3/2019. (HEG)

Download PDF
10/3/2019 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION VICTORY PROCESSING, LLC, and DAVE DISHAW, Plaintiffs, CV 17-27-H-CCL ORDER vs. TIM FOX, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Montana, Defendant. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' "Unopposed Motion To Transfer Consideration of Attorneys Fees on Appeal to District Court" (Doc. 47) is GRANTED, despite Plaintiffs' failure to submit a proposed order, as required by L.R. 7. l(c)(3). Counsel are reminded that both local counsel and pro hac vice counsel are expected to follow the local rules of this Court. Dated this.5~ay of October, 2019.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?