McColl v. American Naturopathic Council et al

Filing 95

ORDERED: The settlement conference currently set for April 4, 2018, is hereby VACATED. This case is referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Johnston for the purpose of conducting a settlement conference. Arrangements for the conference will be made by Judge Johnston. Copy of order emailed to JTJ Chambers. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan on 3/14/2018. (HEG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION TINA MCCOLL, CV 17-40-H-SEH Plaintiff, vs. ALLIED PROFESSIONALS INSURANCE COMPANY, ORDER REFERRING CASE FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Defendant. On December 18, 2017, U.S. District Judge Haddon referred this case to the undersigned for the limited purpose of conducting a settlement conference, and a settlement conference was set for April 4, 2018. (Docs. 64, 73.) Judge Haddon subsequently increased the scope of referral to include all motions excepted from magistrate judges’ jurisdiction as specified in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). (Doc. 82; see also Docs. 44, 52, 74, 80.) Due to the expansion of the scope of referral, which now includes the disposition of dispositive motions and other motions that may be at issue during the settlement conference, the undersigned believes it is appropriate to refer the settlement conference to another magistrate judge. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the settlement conference currently set for April 4, 2018, is hereby VACATED. This case is referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Johnston for the purpose of conducting a settlement conference. Arrangements for the conference will be made by Judge Johnston. The Clerk of Court shall give notice of the entry of this Order to the parties and to Judge Johnston’s chambers. DATED this 14th day of March, 2018. _______________________________ TIMOTHY J. CAVAN United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?