United States v. Robertson et al

Filing 19

ORDERED: Defendants shall file an amended preliminary pretrial statement, addressing with strict compliance Fed.R.Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(A)(ii) and L.R. 16.2(b)(1)(J) on or before October 26, 2017. Failure to file an amended preliminary pretrial statement in full compliance with the terms of this Order could result, without motion, in the imposition of sanctions. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 10/23/2017. (HEG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FILED FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA OCT 2 3 2017 HELENA DIVISION Clerk, U.S. District Court District Of Montana Helena UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, No. CV 17-54-H-SEH vs. ORDER JOSEPH ROBERTSON and CARRIE PFLEGER ROBERTSON, Defendants. The Court's Order setting this matter for preliminary pretrial conference at 1:00 p.m. on October 31, 2017, was issued on September 11, 2017 . 1 The Order setting the preliminary pretrial conference required that each party's preliminary pretrial statement strictly comply with each matter listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l)(A)(i) and (ii) and L.R. 16.2(b)(l). On October 20, 2017, the parties timely filed their respective preliminary 1 Doc. 14. pretrial statements. Defendants' Preliminary Pretrial Statement2 fails to comply with the disclosure requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l)(A)(ii) and L.R. 16.2(b)(l)(J). ORDERED: Defendants shall file an amended preliminary pretrial statement, addressing with strict compliance Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(l)(A)(ii) and L.R. 16.2(b)(l)(J) on or before October 26, 2017. Failure to file an amended preliminary pretrial statement in full compliance with the terms of this Order could result, without motion, in the imposition of sanctions. DATED this~ of October, 2017. ~~!R~c1h3 11ME. HADDON United States District Judge 2 Doc.18. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?