Johnson v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al

Filing 8

ORDER granting 7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice Acknowledgment of PHV Order due by 12/13/2017. Copy mailed to PHV Counsel. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 11/28/2017. (HEG)

Download PDF
FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA NOV 2 8 2017 HELENA DIVISION Cieri<, U.S District Court District Of Montana Helena ELVIS A. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, No. CV-17-106-H-SEH vs. ORDER PPH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, EQUIFAX, INC., TRANSUNION, LLC, and DOES I-V. Defendant. Defendant Trans Union, LLC, has moved for admission of William M. Huse, Esq., ("Huse") of Schuckit & Associates, P.C., Zionsville, Indiana, to practice before this Court in this case with Sara S. Berg, Esq., and Daniel J. Auerbach, Esq., of Browning, Kaleczyc, Berry & Hoven, P.C., Helena, Montana, to act as local counsel. Huse's application appears to be in compliance with L.R. 83.l(d). ORDERED: Trans Union, LLC's Unopposed Motion for Admission of William M. Huse, Esq. Pro Hae Vice 1 is GRANTED on the condition that local counsel will be designated as lead counsel or as co-lead counsel with Huse. Additionally, Huse must do his own work. He must do his own writing, sign his own pleadings, motions, briefs and other documents served or filed by him, and, if designated colead counsel, must appear and participate personally in all proceedings before the Court. Local counsel shall also sign all such pleadings, motions and briefs and other documents served or filed. Admission is personal to Huse; it is not an admission of Schuckit & Associates, P.C, law firm. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: This Order will be withdrawn unless Huse, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order, files an acknowledgment and acceptance of his admission under the terms set forth above DATED this J:1_iy of November, 2017. ~to(~">:\ United States District Judge 1 Doc. 7. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?