Jackson v. Montana State Prison et al

Filing 8

ORDER denying 7 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 8/7/2018. Mailed to Jackson (TAG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION BRADLEY V. JACKSON, CV 18-00001-H-DLC-JTJ Plaintiff, vs. ORDER MONTANA STATE PRISON, WARDEN MICHAEL FLETCHER, MARRISA BOSTWICK and TIFFANY MORRISON, Defendants. Plaintiff Bradley Jackson filed a one paragraph motion seeking default summary judgment because Defendants failed to respond to the original complaint. (Doc. 7.) Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, “[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default.” As Mr. Jackson was previously advised (Doc. 4), pursuant to the federal statutes governing proceedings in forma pauperis and cases filed by prisoners, federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of a case to assess the merits of the claims. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court completed this process and issued an Order directing the Clerk to serve 1 Defendants on August 1, 2018. (Doc. 6.) Defendants have not yet filed a Waiver of Service of Summons. Because there is no proof that Defendants have otherwise been served with the Complaint in this matter, there is no basis for the entry of default or default judgment. Accordingly, the Court issues the following: ORDER Mr. Jackson’s Motion for Default Summary Judgment (Doc. 7) is DENIED. DATED this 7th day of August, 2018. /s/ John Johnston John Johnston United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?