Trotter v. Fletcher

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 in full. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Brian Morris on 7/23/2018. Mailed to Trotter (TAG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION JOHN DAVID TROTTER, CV-18-14-H-BMM-JTJ Petitioner, vs. ORDER MICHAEL FLETCHER, Respondent. United States Magistrate Judge John T. Johnston entered his Amended Findings and Recommendations in this case on April 18, 2018, recommending dismissal of Petitioner John Trotter’s petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 15.) Neither party filed objections. When a party makes no objections, the Court need not review de novo the proposed Findings and Recommendations. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1986). This Court will review Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations, however, for clear error. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Judge Johnston found, and this Court agrees, that this matter should be dismissed because Trotter has not filed an individual petition for habeas corpus 1 relief as directed. Trotter is precluded from filing his request for habeas relief en masse with other petitioners. Thus, his petition will be dismissed without prejudice. The Court has reviewed Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations for clear error. The Court finds no error in Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations, and adopts them in full. IT IS ORDERED that Judge Johnston’s Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 15), are ADOPTED IN FULL. IT IS ORDERED that Trotter’s Petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall enter a judgment of dismissal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. DATED this 23rd day of July, 2018. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?