Spencer v. Hill et al

Filing 21

ORDER denying 20 Declaration for Entry of Default Judgment. Signed by Magistrate Judge John Johnston on 1/7/2019. Mailed to Spencer (TAG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION TIMOTHY EDWARD SPENCER, CV 18-00028-H-BMM-JTJ Plaintiff, vs. ORDER DR. VIRGINIA HILL, DR. STEVEN PALMERI, NURSE LORI SWANSON, NURSE JACK PRESTON, RICHARD OPPER, JOHN GLUCKERT and DR. PERINEAN, Defendants. Plaintiff Timothy Spencer, a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis and without counsel, has filed a Declaration for Entry of Default. (Doc. 20.) He contends Defendants failed to timely answer or otherwise defend against his claims. (Doc. 20.) Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, “[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default.” Pursuant to the federal statutes governing proceedings in forma pauperis and cases filed by prisoners, federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of a 1 case to assess the merits of the claims. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court conducted this screening on October 22, 2018. (Doc. 10.) Because Mr. Spencer is proceeding in forma pauperis, “[t]he officers of the court shall issue and serve all process.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The Court requested Defendants to waive service of summons which they did on November 21, 2018. (Doc. 14.) Defendants timely filed an Answer to Mr. Spencer’s Complaint on December 20, 2018. (Doc. 17). As such, there is no basis for entry of default. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Mr. Spencer’s Declaration for Entry of Default (Doc. 20) is DENIED. DATED this 7th day of January, 2019. /s/ John Johnston John Johnston United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?