Bruck v. Target Corporation

Filing 66

ORDER granting 62 Motion to Redact. Plaintiff shall file a redacted Exhibit A to Mrs. Bruck's Response Brief in Opposition to Target's Motion in Limine to Exclude New Evidence of Dr. Michelotti. The clerk is directed to seal the unredac ted Exhibit A attached to Mrs. Brock's Response Brief in Opposition to Target's Motion in Limine to Exclude New Evidence of Dr. Michelotti. All documents relied upon by the Court in resolving any issue before the Court, including documents filed under seal, will be made public contemporaneously with the Court's ruling on the issue. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 4/26/2019. (HEG)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
HELENA DIVISION

4/26/2019

GAYNELL M. BRUCK,
Plaintiff,

No. CV-18-62-H-SEH

vs.
ORDER

TARGET CORPORATION, a
Minnesota Corporation,
Defendants.
Mrs. Bruck's Unopposed Motion to File a Redacted Exhibit A and to Seal
the Unredacted Exhibit A 1 is GRANTED subject to and upon the conditions of this
Order.
ORDERED:
1.

Plaintiff shall file a redacted Exhibit A to Mrs. Bruck' s Response

Brief in Opposition to Target's Motion in Limine to Exclude New Evidence of Dr.
Michelotti. 2

1

Doc. 62.

2

Doc. 61.
-1-

2.

The clerk is directed to seal the unredacted Exhibit A3 attached to

Mrs. Brock's Response Brief in Opposition to Target's Motion in Limine to
Exclude New Evidence of Dr. Michelotti. 4
3.

All documents relied upon by the Court in resolving any issue before

the Court, including documents filed under seal, will be made public
contemporaneously with the Court's ruling on the issue.
DATED this ,ftlfi.day of April, 2 0 1 ~ 9

-~f,4.~~~~~~~-AME.HADDON
United States District Judge

3

Doc. 61-1.

4

Doc. 61.
-2-