Defenders of Wildlife et al v. Salazar et al

Filing 165

CLERK'S JUDGMENT re; 164 . (CDH, )

Defenders of Wildlife et al v. Salazar et al

Doc. 165

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION Defenders of Wildlife, et al. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) vs. ) ) Ken Salazar, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) ) ____________________________________)

JUDGMENT CV 09-77-M-DWM CV 09-82-M-DWM

Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. X Decision by Court. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motions for Summary Judgment (dkt ## 105, 106) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as moot. They are GRANTED as to Count I of Plaintiffs Defenders of Wildlife, et al.' s Complaint and Count III of Plaintiff Greater Yellowstone Coalition's Complaint, and DENIED as moot in all other aspects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (dkt ## 113, 118, 121, 125, 128, 129) are DENIED in part on the merits as to Count I of Plaintiffs Defenders of Wildlife, et al.' s Complaint and Count III of Plaintiff Greater Yellowstone Coalition's Complaint, and DENIED in part as moot in all other respects. Finally, IT IS ORDERED that the April 2, 2009 Final Rule to Identify the Northern Rocky Mountain Population of Gray Wolf as a Distinct Population Segment (74 Fed. Reg. 15,123) is VACATED and set aside.

Dockets.Justia.com

Dated this 5th day of August, 2010.

PATRICK E. DUFFY, CLERK By: /s/ Coleen Hanley Deputy Clerk