Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library et al

Filing 103

Objection to Hearing/Court Costs re: 100 Order on Motion to Compel. (APP, )

Michael E. Spreadbury
700 S. 4th Street

Hamilton, MT 59840
Telephone: [phone]
mspread(qlhotl1laii.com

Pro Se Plaintif!
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA

MISSOULA DIVISION

) Cause No: CV-Il-64-DWM-JCL

MICHAEL E. SPREADBURY

)

Plaintiff

v.

)

BITTERROOT PUBLIC LIBRARY,

)

OBJECTION TO

CITY OF HAMILTON,

)

HEARING/COURT

LEE ENTERPRISES, INC.,

)

COSTS

BOONE KARLBERG, PC,

)

----------------------)

Comes now Spread bury with respectful objection to hearing September 14, 2011
court costs against a Pro Se IFP litigant in the US District Court.
US District Court has not followed circuit and US Court precedent with respect to
immunity of Defense actors, discovery in aforementioned, erroneous legal
principles in aforementioned Rucker v. Davis 237 F. 3d at 1118 (9'" CU. 2001).

1

ObjeClion to Hearing/Costs

cause 9: ll-C\I-11-64·0WM-JCl.

September 1, 2011

Spreadbury pleads before this honorable court for relief from deprivation of
constitutional right in color of law under 42 USC §1983. US District court. refuses
to uphold peaceful assembly, due process clause inter alia. Spreadbury pleads
before this US District Court as Pro Se IFP (TR.# 15). Improper to award court
costs against Pro Se IFF per A,·tiel" III US ConstitutiolJ.
Spreadbury respectfully objects to US District Court violating oath to uphold US
Constitotion, hold hearing for court costs against Pro Se IFP.

Certificate of Compliance
From LR 7(d)(2)(E) US District Court Rules Montana, I certifY that this brief
conforms with 14 point font, New Times Roman typeface, is double spaced,
contaius 144 words excluding title page, this compliance.

Respectfully submitted this

BY:.~~~~~-.~

~ay of September, 2011
________________

Michael E. Spreadbury, Self Represented Plaintiff

2