Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library et al

Filing 133

ORDER denying 129 Motion for Recusal. Any further motions seeking my disqualification will be stricken. Under Local Rule 7.3, "no party may file amotion for reconsideration without prior leave of Court." Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 10/27/2011. (APP, ) Copy mailed to Spreadbury this date.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA

MISSOULA DIVISION

MICHAEL E. SPREADBURY,
Plaintiff,
vs.
BITTERROOT PUBLIC LIBRARY,
CITY OF HAMIL TON,
LEE ENTERPRISES, INC., and
BOONE KARLBERG P.C.
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)

CV 11-64-M-DWM-JCL

ORDER

)
)

)
)
)

)

-------------------------)
Pending is Plaintiff Michael E. Spreadbury's renewed motion seeking to
disqualify me under 28 U.S.C. § 455. (Dkt # 129.) This renewed motion
regurgitates the arguments addressed in the Order dated August 29,2011 (dkt #
101).

The ruling on this issue is binding on all parties. While Spreadbury is
unhappy and is disposed to truculent exaggeration, any further motions seeking
my disqualification will be stricken. Under Local Rule 7.3, "no party may file a

motion for reconsideration without prior leave of Court." Spreadbury has not
sought leave to file this motion, nor, might I add, would leave be granted unless
factually based.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the renewed Motion (dkt # 129) is
DENIED.

f-

Dated this.!llday of October, 2011.