Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library et al
Filing
194
NOTICE of Second Financial Influence by Michael E. Spreadbury (APP, )
Michael E. Spreadbury
700 S. 4th Street
Hamilton, MT 59840
Telephone: (406) 363-3877
mspread@hotmail.com
Pro Se Plaintiff
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
MISSOULA DIVISION
Cause No.: 9:11-cv-11-64-DWM-JCL
MICHAEL E. SPREADBURY
Plaintiff
)
)
v.
)
NOTICE OF SECOND
BITTERROOT PUBLIC LffiRARY,
)
FINANCIAIL INFLUENCE
CITY OF HAMIL TON,
)
OF US DISTRICT JUDGE
LEE ENTERPRISES INC.,
)
DONALD W. MALLOY
BOONE KARLBERG PC,
)
Defendants
)
Comes now Plaintiff with notice of second financial influence in aforementioned
which requires US District Judge Malloy to recuse himself from case.
US District Judge Donald W. Malloy has been established in aforementioned in
three (3) pleadings for recusal as Board of Visitor for the University ofMontana
Notice of Second Flnandallnfluence
Cause 9:11cv-1l-64-DWM-JCL
December 19, 2011
Law school as qualifYing financial influence. New information is US District
Judge Donald W. Malloy is an adjunct professor at the University of Montana law
school in Missoula Montana. As a material issue to this case, Angela Wetzsteon,
former student clinic attendee in the US District Court under US Magistrate Lynch,
US District Judge Malloy prior to graduation in 2008 from the University of
Montana Law School. Ms. Wetzsteon prosecuted law without proper supervision
in violation of Plaintiff's right to speedy trial, confrontation of witnesses inter alia.
Federal statute 28 USCĀ§455(b) et. seq. requires US District Judge Donald W.
Malloy to recuse himself from the case due to financial influences, even small. A
board position working with the current Dean, and a Adjunct Professorship at the
University of Montana, and refusal to recuse per Spreadbury I are subject to
disciplinary action by the US federal courts.
-ft....
Submitted this
lLday of Dece
Michael E. Spreadbury, Pro e Plaintiff
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?