Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library et al

Filing 228

AFFIDAVIT by Michael E. Spreadbury. (APP, )

Michael E. Spreadbury

FILED

700 S. 4th Street

FEB212012

Hamilton, MT 59840

iii)(

PATRICK It DtlF~

1iEPtl-,y

". CtERK

Telephone: [phone]
mspread(aJ,hotmail.com
Pro Se Plaintiff
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COllRT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA

MISSOULA DIVISION

) Cause No 9:1 lcv-I 1-64-DWM-JCL

MICHAEL E. SPREADBURY
Plaintiff

)

v.

)

BITfERROOT PUBLIC LIBRARY,

)

AFFIDAVIT OF MICHAEL

CITY OF HAMILTON,

)

E. SPREADBURY IN RE:

LEE ENTERPRISES, INC.,

)

MEDICAL FILE

BOONE KARLBERG, PC,

)

----------------------)

Comes now Spreadbury with affidavit to court to clarifY medical information

which has been falsely published in the aforementioned, defames the Plaintiff.
First being sworn, Michael Spreadbury states as follows:
I. I am Michael E. Spreadbury Plaintiff in this case.

1

Affidavit of Plaintiff In RE: Medical File

9:1l-cv-0064-DWM-JCL

February 16, 2012

2_ In 2006 I saw Dr. Wahlberg Ph'd Psychologist solely for a two hour
vocational assessment in Missoula. Montana.
3. Dr. Wahlberg was not my medical provider, nor offered a medical diagnosis,
but a professional impression from subjective multiple choice tests I took at
his direction in the limited time and scope we met.
4. Jerry Zook, M.A. is a Vocational Specialist in Hamilton Montana who
referred me to Dr. Wahlberg for the vocational assessment.
5. Mr. Zook incorrectly identified and published Dr. Wahlberg's impression as
a complete medical diagnosis of "Personality Disorder" which is unfounded
as a medical condition attributed to me.
6. The Social Security Administration, in handling my case for disability added

Dr. Wahlberg's impression as full medical diagnosis unknown to me prior to
Defendant's repeated false publication of my confidential information in
this case in violation ofFRCP 45, 26, lawful controlling authority, ethics.
7. My licensed medical provider Dr. Fincaas, rejected the diagnostic
impression Dr. Wahlberg had in session with me as I specifically asked
about Dr. Wahlberg's impression from 2006 saying he "took it off".
8. Dr. Wahlberg's 2006 impression is not an official medical diagnosis,
rejected by my medical provider, a false interpretation of my medical file.

2

Affidavit of Plaintiff In RE: Medical File

9:11-cv-0064-DWM-JCL

February 16,2012

9. My confidential medical infonnation, although released in this case is to be
protected, not published, exposed; especially false confidential infonnation.
10. Defense counsel does not have license to publish any ofmy confidential
infonnation, false or not; infonnation from Dr. Wahlberg (psychologist) is
not a medical diagnosis, it was rejected by my medical doctor in #7 above_

y-"

MICHAEL E. SPREADBURY

Before me, a Notary Public for the State and County aforesaid, appeared
Michael E. Spreadbury who is known to me or who provided photo
identification and executed the affidavit in my presence.

If. f?j

5_of_..
RITAL.GlLL

NOTARY PUBlIC lor

R_1ng It Hamlllon, MT

L

-1'./

C, I_I_ _ _ _ Name ofNotary Public
­

/

L--=,-__
My_~.::::.t..I.lI.I.j1e=xpn._..L-.........:*,:..-=.A.:4~_d~0 · ____ Notary Public Signature
..
__
_ _..::S'~-_/O_·J.:....:.L)_'_5' _ _ _ _my commission expires
_

I hold the above to be true, under penalty of perjury.
Respectfully submitted this ~day of February, 2012

BY:----r-if----f-f'---------

Mich el E. Spreadbury, Self Represented Plaintiff
3