Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library et al

Filing 271

Brief/Memorandum in Support re 270 MOTION to Amend/Correct 261 Statement of Undisputed Fact,,,,, filed by Lee Enterprises Incorporated. (Smith, Jeffrey)

Download PDF
Anita Harper Poe Jeffrey B. Smith GARLINGTON, LOHN & ROBINSON, PLLP 350 Ryman Street • P. O. Box 7909 Missoula, MT 59807-7909 Telephone (406) 523-2500 Telefax (406) 523-2595 ahpoe@garlington.com jbsmith@garlington.com Attorneys for Defendant, Lee Enterprises, Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION MICHAEL E. SPREADBURY, Cause No. CV-11-064-M-DWM Plaintiff, v. BITTERROOT PUBLIC LIBRARY, CITY OF HAMILTON, LEE ENTERPRISES, INC., and BOONE KARLBERG P.C., DEFENDANT LEE ENTERPRISES, INC.’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SUBSTITUE AMENDED EXHIBIT “A” TO STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS (DKT 261-1) Defendants. Defendant, Lee Enterprises, Inc. (“Lee Enterprises” or “Lee”), through its counsel, Garlington, Lohn & Robinson, PLLP, respectfully submits this Brief in Support of its Motion to Substitute Amended Exhibit “A” to Statement of Undisputed Facts (Dkt. 261-1). Exhibit “A” is an Affidavit signed by Perry Backus (Dkt. 261-1). Paragraph 2 of the Affidavit states: “[t]he August 9, 2010 [Ravalli Republic], article about Mr. Spreadbury reported facts from separate hearings in two different courts held on August 6, 2010, in causes of action brought by Michael Spreadbury.” (Dkt. 261-1, emphasis added.) The Amended Affidavit states the article reported facts from separate hearings in two different matters held on that date. The change does not reflect a material issue and has no impact on Lee’s Motion for Summary Judgment or brief in support. For the foregoing reasons, Lee respectfully requests the Court grant Lee Enterprises’ Motion to Substitute Amended Exhibit “A” to its Statement of Undisputed Facts (Dkt. 261-1). DATED this 20th day of April, 2012. /s/ Jeffrey B. Smith Attorneys for Defendant, Lee Enterprises, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to L.R. 7.1(d)(2)(E), I certify that this DEFENDANT LEE ENTERPRISES, INC.’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SUBSTITUE AMENDED EXHIBIT ‘A’ TO STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS (DKT 261-1) is printed with proportionately spaced Times New Roman text typeface of 14 points; is double-spaced; and the word count, calculated by Microsoft Office Word 2007, is 157 words long, excluding Caption, Certificate of Service and Certificate of Compliance. /s/ Jeffrey B. Smith Attorneys for Defendant, Lee Enterprises, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 20th day of April, 2012, a copy of the foregoing document was served on the following persons by the following means: ___2___ _______ ___1___ _______ _______ _______ CM/ECF Hand Delivery Mail Overnight Delivery Service Fax E-Mail 1. Michael E. Spreadbury P.O. Box 416 Hamilton, MT 59840 Pro Se Plaintiff 2. William L. Crowley Natasha Prinzing Jones Thomas J. Leonard bcrowley@boonekarlberg.com npjones@boonekarlberg.com tleonard@boonekarlberg.com Attorneys for Defendants Bitterroot Public Library, City of Hamilton, and Boone Karlberg P.C. /s/ Jeffrey B. Smith Attorneys for Defendant, Lee Enterprises, Inc.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?