Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library et al
Filing
86
OBJECTION to 76 Findings and Recommendations filed by Michael E. Spreadbury. (APP, )
Michael E. Spreadbury
700 S. 4th Street
FILED
Hamilton, MT 59840
AUG - 9 2011
PATRICK E. DUFFY, CLERK
Telephone: (406) 363-3877
Br.
' iiDEPUEii'rTYrv;:;:'lCL'i;iER;;t:K''"M:U;IS8~O::::-:U:-:::LA':,
mspread@hotmail.com
Pro Se PlaintijJ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
MISSOULA DIVISION
) Cause No: CV-11-64-DWM-JCL
MICHAEL E. SPREADBURY
)
Plaintiff
v.
)
OBJECTION TO COURT
BITTERROOT PUBLIC LIBRARY,
)
FINDINGS;
CITY OF HAMILTON,
)
CITY OF HAMILTON,
LEE ENTERPRISES, INC.,
)
BITTERROOT PUBLIC
BOONE KARLBERG, PC,
)
LffiRARY
INRE:
)
Comes now Spreadbury with objection to court findings and recommendations
with respect to Defendant City, Public Library in the aforementioned.
Motion:
Spreadbury moves that Honorable court rejects findings and recommendation of
US Magistrate Lynch, biased in this case, improper summary judgment dismissal.
1
Plaintiff Objection to Court findings, City
Cause 9:2011-CV-11-64-0WM-JCL
August 6, 2011
Briefin Support
Defendant City of Hamilton, Bitterroot Public Library (hereafter: "public library")
acted with malice towards Spreadbury in prosecuting with negligence, actual
malice, in color of law with other defendants in aforementioned. Defendants
deprived Spreadbury right to peaceful assembly in public park Hague v. CIO 307
US 496, 515 (1939). Defendant City, Public Library meet Stigma-plus test, Joint
Action Test, and Public Function Tests for color of law as private, local
subdivision violating statutory right of library privilege, interference with election,
joint action Johnson v. Knowles 113 F 3d at 1118-1120 ((jh Cir. 1997).
Spreadbury pled Notice of Fraud F.R.Civ. P. 9b (TR. #29). Public library benefits
from Racketeering activity pled before this court (TR. #60). Defendant City of
Hamilton arranged public fraud, litigation fees paid for public library, racketeering
activity to benefit Defendant Boone Schreiber Distributing v. Serv-Well Furniture
Co. 806 F. 2d 1393 ((jh Cir. 1996).
Defendant City of Hamilton defamed Spreadbury via admissions of Mayor Steele ~
87 ~88 2nd Amended Complaint (TR. # 10), knowingly and maliciously
prosecuting Spreadbury peaceful assembly on public property in aforementioned.
Defendant City admitted to prosecuting Spreadbury, site is irrefutably public
2
Plaintiff Objection to Court findings, City
Cause 9:2011-CV-11-64-0WM-JCL
August 6, 2011
property at 306 State St. Hamilton MT 59840 USA: site of Public Library,
Hamilton City Park via certified Platt Map City of Hamilton Montana USA.
This court misinterprets peaceful assembly on public property as ''returning to the
library". Peaceful assembly on public property must be upheld by this court,
regardless of the party before the Honorable Court. The procedural due process
violations of the Bitterroot Public Library, not to mention Public Fraud, properly
pled with specificity conspired by Boone, cannot be denied Bly-Magee v.
California 236 F3d 1014 (9h Cir. 2001) Mathews v. Eldridge 424 US 319 (1976).
Case for trespassing on public property dismissed August 2010, Defendant Bell,
Boone acting in color of law published in December 2010 with malice Spreadbury
convicted of trespassing. Statements made in actual malice nullify privilege under
Montana Code Ann. MCA§ 27-1-804, as does the violation ofpeaceful assembly
abridged by City, Defendants in aforementioned Amendment 1,14 US Constitution,
Hague at 6.
Known false statements about constitutionally protected activity such as peaceful
assembly cannot be abridged by Montana law, within findings before this court due
process clause 14 Amendment US Constitution. Defendant City has imputed crime
of Spreadbury when there is none, deprived constitutional right, engaged in
Racketeering, fraud as properly pled before this court (TR. #29, 60).
3
Plaintiff Objection to Court findings, City
Cause 9:2011-CV-11-64-0WM-JCL
August 6, 2011
Magistrate Judge Lynch, with prior bias to Spreadbury makes finding of four (4)
Finding and Recommendations (TR. # 67, 75, 76, 79) un-necessarily punitive on
Spreadbury. As Defendant City, Public Library impute criminal trespass on public
property meets standard for emotional distress set under both Sacco v. HMIP Inc.
271 Mont. 209 (1995) actual lIED prima facie standard in Montana: Johnson v.
Supersave 211 Mont. 156 (1984). A prima facie case in Montana for lIED or
NIED needs only have this element without physical or psychological injury
Johnson Mont. Supra:
whether tortuous conduct results in a substantial invasion of a legally
protected interest and causes a significant impact upon the Plaintiff.
In the aforementioned, City, Public Library imputed criminal activity as none were
perfected by Spreadbury engaging in peaceful activity on public property August
20,2009. Significant impact includes malicious republication, publication in
national newspaper with 1.8 Million readers daily, and radio, internet, and
television coverage of criminal act of trespassing on public property, Protected in
the 1st Amendment US Constitution, as is asking for help from a librarian in public,
unless said activity occurs in the 48th ranked state of Montana [US DO] 2007],
where US District Judges ignore federal rules, Montana, US Statutes, and well
established court precedent in 42 USC§ 1983 herein.
4
Plaintiff Objection to Court findings, City
cause 9:2011-CV-1l-64-0WM-JCL
August 6, 2011
Judicial relief and equal protection do not mean allowance of deprivation of rights,
nor protecting law finns who participate in Racketeering, and Fraud found in
FRCP 9b and well pled before this court (TR. # 29, 60). Due to initial bias from
Spreadbury v. Hoffman 9:10-cv-00049-DVM and allowing law student, clinic
attendee within this District to practice law without a license against Spreadbury,
this court has shown bias, in the aforementioned without proper recusal 28
USC§455 et. seq.
Dismissal of Summary Judgment improper for Defendant City, Public Library: no
material fact remaining in case; merely denial of damage to Spreadbury by court.
Spreadbury has pled that immunity of City actors in aforementioned must be
detennined prior to discovery per Harlow v. Fitzgerald 457 US at 818 (1978).
Honorable District court has ignored well established court precedent in ordering
compel of evidence for City of Hamilton, Public Library (TR. # 68). Spreadbury
pled in Response to Compel (TR. #60) City actors do not deserve qualified
immunity, Defense failed to functionally plead for such immunity before this court
Morley v. Walker 175 F. 3d 756 (gth Cir., 1999).
With the Bias evident towards Spreadbury, and overzealous protection of
Defendant City of Hamilon, public library, defendant private law firm outside
established court precedent, allows for appeal to a higher court.
5
Plaintiff Objection to Court findings, City
Cause 9:2011-CV-11-64-0WM-JCL
August 6, 2011
Certificate of Compliance
From LR 7(d)(2)(E) US District Court Rules Montana, I certify that this brief
conforms with 14 point font, New Times Roman typeface, is double spaced,
contains 879 words excluding title page, this compliance.
Respectfully submitted this
£
~
day of
BY:
-------+~~~~=-----~~-----------
Michael . Spreadbury, Se fRepresented Plaintiff
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?