Johnson v. Astrue
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 20 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Findings and Recommendations re 24 Findings and Recommendations. The Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Order. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 5/30/2012. (dle)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security
Tamara Johnson filed this lawsuit against the Commissioner of Social
Security because the Social Security Administration denied her application for
disability insurance benefits. The Court referred this case to Magistrate Judge
Lynch under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Judge Lynch recommends granting Johnson’s
motion in part and reversing and remanding in part. The Court agrees and adopts
in full Judge Lynch’s Findings and Recommendation.
Neither party objected to Judge Lynch’s Findings and Recommendation.
The Court therefore reviews the Findings and Recommendation for clear error.
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313
(9th Cir. 1981).
Judge Lynch committed no clear error. The record shoes that the
administrative law judge rejected Dr. Patrick Danaher’s residual functional
capacity assessment without providing any explanation. (See e.g. A.R. 20.) This
was error. See Reddick v. Chater, 157 F.3d 715, 725 (9th Cir. 1998).
Consistent with Judge Lynch’s recommendation, remand is appropriate
because the administrative law judge must consider whether Johnson is disabled
after properly considering Dr. Danaher’s opinion.
IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Lynch’s Findings and
Recommendation (doc. 24) are ADOPTED IN FULL.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Tamara Johnson’s motion for summary
judgment (doc. 13) is GRANTED IN PART and the Commissioner’s motion for
summary judgment (doc. 20) is DENIED. The Commissioner’s decision is
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this order.
Dated this 30th day of May 2012.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?