Federal Trade Commission v. Emerica Media Corporation et al
Filing
283
ORDER granting 282 Motion to Stay. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before 7/21/2017, Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission shall filed either (1) proposed Stipulated Orders for Permanent Injunctions and Monetary Judgments for the Court's approval, or (2) a status report. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the summary judgment hearing set for 5/24/2017 is VACATED. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 5/22/2017. (NOS)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
MISSOULA DIVISION
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
CV 13-03-M-DLC
Plaintiff,
ORDER
vs.
AMERICAN EVOICE, LTD., EMERICA
MEDIA CORPORATION, FONERIGHT,
INC., GLOBAL VOICE MAIL, LTD.,
HEARYOU2, INC., NETWORK
ASSURANCE, INC., SECURATDAT,
INC., TECHMAX SOLUTIONS, INC.,
VOICE MAIL PROFESSIONALS, INC.,
STEVE V. SANN, TERRY D. LANE,
a/k/a TERRY D. SANN, NATHAN M.
SANN, ROBERT M. BRAACH,
Defendants.
and
BIBLIOLOGIC, LTD.,
Relief Defendant.ยท
Upon the joint motion of Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission, Defendants
Steven Sann; American eVoice, Ltd.; Emerica Media Corp.; FoneRight, Inc.;
Global Voice Mail, Ltd.; HearYou2, Inc.; Network Assurance, Inc.; SecuratDat,
Inc.; Techmax Solutions, Inc.; and Voice Mail Professionals, Inc.; and Chapter 7
1
Trustee Christy L. Brandon, for a sixty day stay of these proceedings, and finding
good cause therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that the joint motion (Doc. 282) is
GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before July 21, 2017, Plaintiff
Federal Trade Commission shall file either ( 1) proposed Stipulated Orders for
Permanent Injunctions and Monetary Judgments for the Court's approval, or (2) a
status report.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the summary judgment hearing set for
Wednesday, May 24, 2017, is VACATED.
DA TED this 22.1-ay of May 2017.
Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge
United States District Court
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?