Defenders of Wildlife v. Jewell et al

Filing 146

ORDER approving stipulations. Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs are DENIED as moot. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' stipulations. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 5/9/2017. Associated Cases: 9:14-cv-00246-DLC, 9:14-cv-00247-DLC, 9:14-cv-00250-DLC (ASG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION FILED MAY 0 9 2017 Cle~. y.s Diatrict Court D1stnct Of Montana Missoula DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, CV 14-246-M-DLC Plaintiff, (Consolidated with Case Nos. 14-247-M-DLC and 14-250-M-DLC) vs. RYAN ZINKE, Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior, in his official capacity, JIM KURTH, Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, in his official capacity, Defendants, and ff IDAHO FARM BUREAU FEDERATION; WYOMING FARM BUREAU; MONTANA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION; WASHINGTON FARM BUREAU, IDAHO STATE SNOWMOBILE ASSOCIATION; COLORADO SNOWMOBILE ASSOCIATION; COLORADO OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE COALITION; AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE; MONTANA PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION; WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE; -1- ORDER GOVERNOR C.L. "BUTCH" OTTER; STATE OF MONTANA; MONTANA FISH, WILDLIFE AND PARKS; and STATE OF WYOMING, Defendant-Intervenors. On May 5, 2017, this Court received the parties' Joint Stipulations for Attorneys' Fees and Costs entered into by and between: ( 1) Plaintiff Defenders of Wildlife and Federal Defendants Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior, et al., concerning Plaintiffs' claim for fees and costs in Case No. 9:14-CV-246-DLC; (2) Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity, et al., and Federal Defendants Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior, et al., concerning Plaintiffs' claim for fees and costs in Case No. 9:14-CV-247-DLC; and (3) Plaintiffs WildEarth Guardians, et al., and Federal Defendants Ryan Zinke, Secretary of the Interior, et al., concerning Plaintiffs' claim for fees and costs in Case No. 9:14-CV-250-DLC. Plaintiffs filed motions for attorneys' fees in this case on November 4, 2016, and November 4, 2016. The parties jointly moved to stay briefing on Plaintiffs' fee motions to provide the parties with sufficient time to engage in settlement discussions regarding Plaintiffs' request for attorneys' fees, costs, and other expenses. The Court granted the stay. The stipulations now before the Court set forth the amount of $27,000 -2- agreed to for satisfaction of Plaintiffs' claim for attorneys fees in 9:14-CV-246-DLC, $176,000 agreed to for satisfaction of Plaintiffs' claim for attorneys fees in 9:14-CV-247-DLC, and $210,000 agreed to for satisfaction of Plaintiffs' claim for attorneys fees in 9:14-CV-250-DLC, along with various other provisions. The stipulations state that the amounts agreed to resolve all of Plaintiffs' claims for attorneys' fees and costs and that Plaintiffs agree to withdraw their pending motions for an award of attorneys' fees and costs upon the Court's approval of the stipulations. Since the stipulations clearly intend for the withdrawal of Plaintiffs' motions, the Court will deny the motions as moot. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulations (Docs. 142, 143, 144) are APPROVED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (Docs. 126, 127, 131) are DENIED as moot. The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' stipulations. DATED this r ~ day of May, 2017. Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge United States District Court -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?