Richard v. Andrew et al

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 9 in full. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 1/19/2016. Mailed to Richard. (TAG, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION FIL,ED JAN 1 9 2016 Clerk, U.S. District Court District Of Montana Missoula CYRIL K. RICHARD, CV 15-63-M-DLC-JCL Petitioner, ORDER vs. BOYD ANDREW and the ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA, Respondents. United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch entered his Order, Findings and Recommendations on November 10, 2015, recommending denying Petitioner Cyril K. Richard's ("Richard") Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Richard failed to timely object to the findings and recommendations, and so waived the right to de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(l)(C). This Court reviews for clear error those findings and recommendations to which no party objects. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000) -1- (citations omitted). Having reviewed the Findings and Recommendations, the Court finds no clear error in Judge Lynch's conclusion that Richard's Petition should be denied on the merits. There being no clear error in Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendations, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 9) are ADOPTED IN FULL. (2) Richard's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED on the merits. (3) The Clerk of Court is directed to enter by separate document a judgment in favor of Respondents and against Petitioner. (4) A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Dated this 19th day of January, 2016. Dana L. Christensen, Chief istrict Judge United States District Court -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?