McFadden v. Colvin

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING 21 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying 11 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 8/5/2016. (APP, )

Download PDF
FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION LEROY MCFADDEN, AUG 0 5 2016 Cleric, US District Court District Of Montana Missoula CV 15-82-M-DLC-JCL Plaintiff, ORDER vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch entered findings and recommendations in this case on July 8, 2016, recommending that Plaintiff Leroy McFadden's ("McFadden") motion for summary judgment in this Social Security case be denied. Neither party objected to the findings and recommendations, and so both have waived the right to de novo review thereof. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(l)(C). This Court reviews for clear error those findings and recommendations to which no party objects. See McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Clear error exists ifthe Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). -1- Having reviewed the findings and recommendations, the Court finds no clear error in Judge Lynch's conclusion that the administrative law judge's decision was based on substantial evidence and free of legal error. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Judge Lynch's findings and recommendations (Doc. 21) are ADOPTED IN FULL. McFadden's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 11) is DENIED and the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. DATED this 5"""day of August, 20 6. Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge United States District Court -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?