Williamson v. Internal Revenue Service

Filing 32

DEFAULT JUDGMENT against Nathan Ricciardi and Troyous Ricciardi. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 5/16/2017. (ASG)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION RICHARD LYLE WILLIAMSON, JR., Debtor, ORDER RICHARD LYLE WILLIAMSON, JR., Plaintiff, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Counterclaimant, vs. RICHARD LYLE WILLIAMSON, JR., Counterclaim Defendant, and NA THAN RICCIARDI and TROYOUS RICCIARDI, Additional Defendants on Counterclaim. 1 This matter is before the Court on the United States' Motion for Default Judgment against Nathan Ricciardi and Troyous Ricciardi. Having considered the Motion, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The United States' Motion for Default Judgment as to Nathan Ricciardi and Troyous Ricciardi (Doc. 28) is GRANTED. 2. Defendants Nathan Ricciardi and Troyous Ricciardi have failed to plead or otherwise defend this case and are therefore deemed to have admitted the allegations in the United States' Counterclaim. 3. Defendant Nathan Ricciardi is indebted to the United States for unpaid 26 U.S.C. § 6672 assessments in amount of $57,049.58, as of February 5, 2017, plus statutory interest and other statutory additions as provided by law, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 6601, 6621, and 6622, and 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c), until paid. 4. Defendant Troyous Ricciardi is indebted to the United States for unpaid 26 U.S.C. § 6672 assessments in amount of $47,996.85, as of February 5, 2017, plus statutory interest and other statutory additions as provided by law, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §§ 6601, 6621, and 6622, and 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c), until paid. . ~ Dated this~ day of May, 2017. Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?