Koontz v. Bank of America Corporation et al
Filing
19
ORDER finding as moot 3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 13 Stipulated Motion; granting 14 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 11/12/2015. (APP, )
FILED
NOV 12 2015
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
MISSOULA DIVISION
JOHNA KOONTZ,
Clerk, U.S District Court
District Of Montana
Missoula
CV 15- 108-M-DLC
Plaintiff,
ORDER
vs.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., successor
by merger to BAC HOME LOANS
SERVICING, LP, f/kla COUNTRYWIDE
HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP and
COUNTRYWIDE BANK, N.A.; and
RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS,
INC., ,
Defendants.
Before the Court are the parties' stipulated motion to dismiss Defendant
Bank of America Corporation, as well as Plaintiffs unopposed motion for a oneday extension for filing her response to Defendants' second motion to dismiss.
Furthermore, the Court notes that Plaintiff filed her Amended Complaint by right
on September 18, 2015, twenty-one days after Defendants filed their first motion
to dismiss. Defendants do not dispute that Plaintiffs Amended Complaint mooted
their first motion, and indeed filed their second motion as a result.
-1-
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
(1)
The parties' stipulated motion to dismiss Defendant Bank of
American Corporation (Doc. 13) is GRANTED.
(2)
Plaintiffs unopposed motion for an extension to file her response to
Defendants' second motion to dismiss (Doc. 14) is GRANTED.
(3)
Defendants' first motion to dismiss (Doc. 3) is DENIED AS MOOT.
DATED this
ll#, day ofNovember,
015.
Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge
United States District Court
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?