Danaher v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company et al

Filing 59

ORDER granting 57 MOTION to Consolidate Cases CV-15-114-DLC and CV-16-88-DLC filed by U.S. Bank National Association. Motions due by 7/5/2017. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 10/5/2017. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/12/2017 at 2:30 PM in the Russell Smith Courthouse, Missoula, MT before Judge Dana L. Christensen. Jury Trial set for 10/23/2017 at 9:00 AM in the Russell Smith Courthouse, Missoula, MT before Judge Dana L. Christensen. The Court's Order in CV 16-88-M-DLC dated October 11, 2016,(Doc. 11) shall remain in full force and effect in all other respects. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 5/22/2017. (NOS)

Download PDF
FILED MAY 2 2 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION SUSAN DANAHER, Clerk, U S District Court District Of Montana Missoula CV 15-114-M-DLC Plaintiff, (Consolidated with Case No. 16-88-M-DLC) vs. ORDER TRINITY UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY, and KEMPER PREFERRED, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a subsidiary of U.S. BANCORP, a/k/a U.S. BANK HOME MORTGAGE, and JOHN DOES I-X, Defendants. Defendant U.S. Bank National Association, a subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp ("U.S. Bank") moves the Court to consolidate the above action with Susan Danaher vs. US. Bank National Association, a subsidiary of US. Bancorp, alk/a US. Bank Home Mortgage, and John Does 1-X, Cause No. CV-16-88-DLC for all pretrial purposes pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a). This motion is unopposed as the parties agree the two claims arise from common questions of law and fact. The Court agrees and finds good cause to consolidate these cases. -1- Defendant U.S. Bank also moves the Court for a status conference in this matter to discuss revising the schedule for the disposition of this case. The Court will grant Defendant's motion to consolidate the cases and will adhere to the scheduling order and trial date set forth in Cause No. CV-16-88-DLC, pursuant to Defendant's request. Thus, a scheduling conference is not necessary. The new scheduling order for this consolidated case is outlined below. ' Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Susan Danaher vs. Trinity Universal Insurance Company, Kemper Preferred, and US. Bank National Association, a subsidiary of US. Bancorp, alk/a US. Bank Home Mortgage, and John Does 1-X, Cause No. CV-15-114-DLC, is consolidated with Susan Danaher vs. US. Bank National Association, a subsidiary of US. Bancorp, alk/a US. Bank Home Mortgage, and John Does 1-X, Cause No. CV-16-88-DLC, for all pretrial purposes. All docketing shall be filed in the lead case, Cause No. CV 15-114-M-DLC, and spread to the member case, Cause No. CV-16-88-DLC. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the scheduling order and trial date in Cause No. CV-16-88-DLC (Doc. 11) is adopted in this consolidated case. Therefore, the following schedule will govern all further pretrial proceedings: Motions Deadline (fully briefed): July 5, 2017 -2- Motions In Limine Deadline: (fully briefed) August 4, 2017 Attorney Conference to Prepare Final Pretrial Order: week of September 18, 2017 E-file Final Pretrial Order, Proposed Jury Instructions, Proposed V oir Dire Questions, and Trial Briefs and e-mail to dlc_propord@mtd.uscourts.gov (Trial Briefs are optional): October 5, 2017 Notice to Court Reporter of Intent to Use Real-Time: October 5, 201 7 Notice to LT. Supervisor of Intent to Use CD-ROM or Videoconferencing: October 5, 2017 Final Pretrial Conference: October 12, 2017 at 2:30 p.m. Missoula, Montana Jury Trial (7-member jury): October 23, 2017 at 9:00 p.m. Russell Smith Courthouse Missoula, Montana The Court's Order in Cause No. CV-16-88-DLC dated October 11, 2016 (Doc. 11) shall remain in full force and effect in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for a Status Conference in Cause No. CV-16-88-DLC (Doc. 21) is DENIED as moot. -3- DATED this 2.2.~day ofMay, 2017. Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge United States District Court -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?