Tkachyk v. Travelers Home & Marine Ins. Company et al
ORDER granting 31 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Mark L. Hanover. Signed by Judge Dana L. Christensen on 1/3/2017. (ASG)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
SARA TKACHYK, individually and on
behalf of herself and all other similarly
JAN 0 3 2017
Clerk, U.S Oiatric:t Court
District Of Montana
TRAVELERS HOME & MARINE
INSURANCE COMPANY, THE
CHARTER OAK FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY, NORTHLAND CASUALTY
COMPANY, NORTHLAND INSURANCE
COMPANY, PHOENIX INSURANCE
COMPANY, ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE
INSURANCE COMPANY, ST. PAUL
MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY,
THE STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY, TRAVELERS CASUALTY
INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA,
INSURANCE COMPANY, THE
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY,
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY
OF AMERICA, THE TRAVELERS
INDEMNITY COMPANY OF
PROPERTY CASUAL TY COMPANY OF
AMERICA, and RODERICK MCNEIL,
Defendants, by and through their attorney Marshal L. Mickelson of the law
firm of Corette Black Carlson & Mickelson, move for the admission of Mark L.
Hanover to practice before this Court in this case with Marshal L. Mickelson to act
as local counsel. The application appears to be in order.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' motion to admit Mark L.
Hanover pro hac vice (Doc. 31) is GRANTED on the conditi.on that Mr. Hanover
does his own work. This means that he must: (1) do his own writing; (2) sign his
own pleadings, motions, and briefs; and (3) appear and participate personally.
Counsel shall take steps to register in the Court's electronic filing system
(CM-ECF). Further information is available on the Court's website,
www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from the Clerk's Office.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless
Mr. Hanover within fifteen (15) days of this Order files a separate pleading
acknowledging his admission under the terms set forth above.
~'°~day of January, 2
Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge
United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?