Jacobs v. Bank of America, NA. et al
ORDER granting 104 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Specialized Loan Serving LLC shall retain new counsel within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 105 Motion to File Under Seal is GRANTED. The document lodged at Doc. 106 is deemed filed under seal as of May 19, 2017. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 5/22/2017. (NOS)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
MAY 2 2 2017
Cieri<, U.S Diatrict Court
District Of Montana
JOHN G. JACOBS,
BANK OF AMERICA; RECONTRUST
COMP ANY, N.A.; and SPECIALIZED
LOAN SERVICING, LLC,
Counsel for Defendant Specialized Loan Servicing LLC seeks to withdraw
as counsel in this matter. (Doc. 104.) Counsel also seek to file their supporting
declaration under seal. (Doc. 105.) Counsel indicates that they served their notice
of intent upon their client at least 14 days before seeking to withdraw and that the
client was advised of the necessity of seeking new counsel. It appears counsel is
owed attorneys' fees in this matter and has provided facts constituting good cause
Counsel having met the requirements of Local Rule 83.3(b), IT IS
ORDERED that counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel of record for Specialized
Loan Serving LLC (Doc. 104) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Specialized Loan Serving LLC shall
retain new counsel within fourteen ( 14) days of the date of this Order. The failure
to do so may result in default judgment being entered. Per the Scheduling Order
entered June 21, 2016, trial is set for July 24, 2017, (Doc. 25), and neither that trial
date nor any of the pending deadlines will be continued.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel's request for leave to file their
supporting declaration under seal (Doc. 105) is GRANTED. The document
lodged at Doc. 106 is ~d filed under seal as of May 19, 2017.
Dated this~ day of May, 2017.
, District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?