Wildearth Guardians v. Hoover et al

Filing 104

ORDER granting (103) Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 9:16-cv-00065-DWM; granting (49) Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 9:17-cv-00099-DWM. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 3/8/2018. Served via CM/ECF on local counsel Kathleen DeSoto. Associated Cases: 9:16-cv-00065-DWM, 9:17-cv-00099-DWM (ASG)

Download PDF
FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, MAR 08 2213 Clerk, U.S Courts Di~trict Of Montana Missoula Division Lead Case No. CV 16-65-M-DWM Plaintiff, Member Case No. CV 17-99-M-DWM and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, Consolidated-Plaintiff, ORDER vs. UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE; et al., Defendants, and MONTANA TRAPPERS ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL TRAPPERS ASSOCIATION, AND FUR INFORMATION COUNCIL OF AMERICA, Defendant-Intervenors. Defendant-Intervenor Fur Information Council of America moves for the admission of Mindy B. Pava to practice before this Court in this consolidated 1 action with Kathleen DeSoto to act as local counsel. Ms. Pava's application appears to be in order. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant-Intervenor's motion to admit Mindy B. Pavapro hac vice (Doc. 103) is GRANTED on the condition that Ms. Pava shall do her own work. This means that Ms. Pava must do her own writing; sign her own pleadings, motions, and briefs; and appear and participate personally. Counsel shall take steps to register in the Court's electronic filing system ("CMECF"). Further information is available on the Court's website, www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from the Clerk's Office. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless Ms. Pava, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order, files a notice acknowledging her admission under the terms set forth above. DATED this K /- day of March, 2018. / / lloy, District Judge istrict Court ( 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?