Wildearth Guardians v. Hoover et al
Filing
104
ORDER granting (103) Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 9:16-cv-00065-DWM; granting (49) Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 9:17-cv-00099-DWM. Signed by Judge Donald W. Molloy on 3/8/2018. Served via CM/ECF on local counsel Kathleen DeSoto. Associated Cases: 9:16-cv-00065-DWM, 9:17-cv-00099-DWM (ASG)
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
MISSOULA DIVISION
WILDEARTH GUARDIANS,
MAR 08 2213
Clerk, U.S Courts
Di~trict Of Montana
Missoula Division
Lead Case No.
CV 16-65-M-DWM
Plaintiff,
Member Case No.
CV 17-99-M-DWM
and
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL
DIVERSITY,
Consolidated-Plaintiff,
ORDER
vs.
UNITED STATES FISH &
WILDLIFE SERVICE; et al.,
Defendants,
and
MONTANA TRAPPERS
ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL
TRAPPERS ASSOCIATION, AND
FUR INFORMATION COUNCIL OF
AMERICA,
Defendant-Intervenors.
Defendant-Intervenor Fur Information Council of America moves for the
admission of Mindy B. Pava to practice before this Court in this consolidated
1
action with Kathleen DeSoto to act as local counsel. Ms. Pava's application
appears to be in order.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant-Intervenor's motion to admit
Mindy B. Pavapro hac vice (Doc. 103) is GRANTED on the condition that Ms.
Pava shall do her own work. This means that Ms. Pava must do her own writing;
sign her own pleadings, motions, and briefs; and appear and participate personally.
Counsel shall take steps to register in the Court's electronic filing system ("CMECF"). Further information is available on the Court's website,
www.mtd.uscourts.gov, or from the Clerk's Office.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Order is subject to withdrawal unless
Ms. Pava, within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order, files a notice
acknowledging her admission under the terms set forth above.
DATED this
K
/-
day of March, 2018.
/
/
lloy, District Judge
istrict Court
(
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?