Bentley v. Colvin

Filing 18

ORDER granting 17 Motion to Remand to Commissioner of Social Security. REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch on 3/17/2017. (APP)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA MISSOULA DIVISION RUPERT A. BENTLEY JR., CV 16-90-M-DLC-JCL Plaintiff, ORDER vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security Administration Defendant. Based on the stipulation of the parties, IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner’s decision in regard to Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act be REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings. On remand, the Administrative Law Judge will (1) consider, evaluate, and assign appropriate weight to the medical opinions of record, including but not limited to the opinions of Drs. Vanichkachorn and Butcher; (2) consider, evaluate, and assign appropriate weight to Ms. Norton’s “other medical source” opinion; (3) reevaluate the lay witness testimony from Mr. Cattlerin, and Ms. Bentley; and (4) assess Plaintiff’s symptom testimony under SSR 16-3p. If 1 applicable, the ALJ should weigh any additional limitations the claimant alleged in the May 2015 hearing and supplement the record to include the transcript from the May 2015 hearing, if possible. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk will enter judgment pursuant to this order. The ALJ and Plaintiff should be permitted to raise and pursue additional issues, augmenting the record as necessary to fully and fairly address such issues. This remand should be made pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and Plaintiff should be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and costs, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), upon proper request to this Court. DATED this 17th day of March, 2017. Jeremiah C. Lynch United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?